As the largest British-built heavy bomber of World War II, the Short Stirling stood impressively tall at nearly twenty-three feet, powered by its robust Bristol Hercules radial engines that collectively generated 6,600 horsepower.
This formidable aircraft was renowned for its reliability and sturdiness, earning high regard in service. Introduced during the challenging early years of the war, the Stirling not only contributed significantly to the war effort but also served as a powerful symbol of Britain’s escalating capability in aerial warfare, boosting morale at a critical time.
The development of the Short Stirling began in response to the Air Ministry’s Specification B.12/36, which called for a new class of heavy bombers capable of carrying large payloads over long distances. Short Brothers, renowned for their large flying boat designs, undertook the project.
Contents
The development and design of the Short Stirling
In the 1930s, the Royal Air Force (RAF) primarily focused on twin-engine bombers, which placed less strain on engine production and maintenance – sectors already stretched thin with the introduction of numerous new aircraft types.
Read More: The Sopwith Camel Downed 1,294 Enemy Aircraft
However, the limited power of these aircraft led the British to invest in the development of massive engines in the 2,000-horsepower range to enhance performance. Yet, by the late 1930s, none of these powerful engines were ready for production.
Meanwhile, the United States and the Soviet Union were exploring bombers powered by four smaller engines, achieving impressive range and decent lifting capacity. Inspired by these developments, in 1936, the RAF began considering the feasibility of four-engined bombers.
Responding to this new direction, the Air Ministry issued Specification B.12/36, calling for a high-speed, long-range, four-engined strategic bomber that could be quickly designed and constructed.
The specifications were ambitious: a maximum bomb load of 14,000 pounds for a range of 2,000 miles or a lighter payload of 8,000 pounds for 3,000 miles, challenging benchmarks for that era.
The envisioned aircraft would have a six-person crew and a normal weight of 48,000 pounds, with a potential overload of 65,000 pounds. It needed to cruise at speeds over 230 mph at an altitude of 15,000 feet, equipped with three gun turrets for defense.
Catapult Assistance
Additionally, the aircraft was expected to double as a troop transport for 24 soldiers and support takeoff via catapult assistance when heavily loaded. The idea was for the bomber to transport troops to remote parts of the British Empire and then support them with bombing operations.
Read More: Vickers Wellesley Long-Range Bomber
To facilitate this role and ease production, the aircraft needed to be disassemble for train transport. Given its potential operation from rudimentary airfields, it was required to take off from a 500-foot runway and clear 50-foot trees at the end – a challenging feat even for many small aircraft today.
Aviation author Geoffrey Norris noted that these stringent requirements, especially the maximum wingspan of 100 feet to fit existing infrastructure, negatively impacted the Stirling’s performance, particularly its low ceiling and restriction to carrying only 500 lb bombs.
Read More: The A.W.52 was Britain’s attempt at a Flying Wing
In mid-1936, Specification B.12/36 was sent to several manufacturers, including Supermarine, Boulton Paul, Handley Page, and Armstrong Whitworth, and later extended to the broader industry in August. Initially overlooked, Shorts was later invited due to their existing designs and adequate resources.
They adapted their four-engine flying boat designs, particularly the S.25 Sunderland, removing the lower deck and boat hull to create the S.29 proposal.
New design
This new design retained many features of the Sunderland, including the wings, construction method, and the upward bend at the fuselage’s rear, originally intended to keep the Sunderland’s tail clear of sea spray. The S.29, as initially designed, was anticipated to perform well at high altitudes.
Following a Tender Design Conference in October 1936, the S.29 was considered, but not top-listed among the designs. The Supermarine submission led the pack, followed by others, with the Short S.29 later in the lineup.
Supermarine’s design was initially selected for prototype development in January 1937. However, an alternative to the Supermarine was sought for backup, and Shorts was chosen for their four-engined aircraft experience.
Read More: Vickers Swallow Was a Supersonic Project By Barnes Wallis
The original S.29 faced criticism, and in February 1937, the Air Ministry suggested significant design modifications, including potential engine changes, an increased service ceiling, and a reduced wingspan. Shorts accepted these extensive redesign requirements.
Sunderland’s 114-Foot Wing
Doubts about Supermarine’s delivery capabilities, especially after the death of their designer Reginald Mitchell, added importance to the Short’s project, leading to the order of two prototypes.
The S.29, based on the Sunderland’s 114-foot wing, had to be resized to under 100 feet to meet new specifications. To achieve the necessary lift with a shorter span and added weight, the redesigned wing was thickened and reshaped.
While it’s often said the wingspan was capped at 100 feet to fit existing hangars, the actual maximum hangar opening was 112 feet, and outdoor servicing was specified. The wingspan limit was more a method to control the aircraft’s overall size.
Read More: Flapping wings anyone? The Riout 102T Alérion Ornithopter
In June 1937, the S.29 was officially accepted as a secondary option to the Supermarine Type 317 and formally ordered in October, with Shorts and Supermarine both instructed to proceed with their respective designs.
What The Pilots Thought
Pilots who flew the Short Stirling often remarked that once it was airborne, the aircraft was a pleasure to fly. Despite its size, it was noted for its surprising maneuverability and lacked any significant handling issues.
Aviation writer Geoffrey Norris even described the Stirling as being “more maneuverable and responsive than any other aircraft in its class.” The aircraft’s limitations in terms of its lower operational ceiling and limited range were generally overlooked in pilot memoirs, overshadowed by the positive flying experience.
However, the Stirling, along with other large, heavy four-engine tail-wheel bombers like the Handley Page Halifax, Avro Lancaster, and Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress, presented considerable challenges during takeoff and landing.
Read More: Was the Vought XF5U the Cause of UFO Sightings?
These difficulties were especially pronounced for the many young and inexperienced pilots who filled the ranks of the rapidly expanding Commonwealth and American air forces. Later bomber designs, such as the Consolidated B-24 Liberator and Boeing B-29 Superfortress, adopted a nose-wheel (tricycle) undercarriage, which offered easier control during takeoff, landing, and taxiing.
Particularly Challenging to Handle
This design also facilitated cargo loading and maintenance, as the aircraft’s cabin, engines, and systems were closer to the ground. The Stirling’s elongated undercarriage was a direct response to an RAF request for increased wing incidence.
The Stirling was particularly challenging to handle during takeoff and landing compared to its contemporaries. Following several serious accidents and total losses caused by uncontrolled ground loops on takeoff, the RAF instituted a special training and certification program for all Stirling pilots.
A proper takeoff technique required gradually increasing the throttle on the right engines during the first 20 seconds of the takeoff run until the rudder became effective for directional control.
If the throttles for all four engines were advanced simultaneously, the aircraft would veer uncontrollably to the right, risking a collapse of the landing gear, which could be catastrophic, especially when the aircraft was loaded with bombs and fuel.
Read More: Silent Witness of Air History – Aircraft Graveyards
Landing posed its own set of challenges. Pilots had to be wary of the Stirling’s tendency to stall and drop abruptly onto the runway during the final approach. Given the aircraft’s substantial weight, a hard landing could cause severe structural damage.
Throughout its service, it was not uncommon for Stirlings and other large four-engine bombers to be written off after “dropped” landings, being deemed beyond repair and only suitable for salvaging parts.
Operational History of the Short Stirling
In July 1940, the inaugural production model of the Short Stirling took off from Rochester, and by August 1940, it had been delivered to No. 7 Squadron at RAF Leeming in North Yorkshire. After a four-month period of familiarization and adjustment to the new aircraft, the Stirling achieved operational status in January 1941.
Its first combat mission took place on the night of February 10-11, 1941, targeting fuel storage tanks in Vlaardingen near Rotterdam, Netherlands.
This mission, involving the first three operational Stirlings, was considered successful. By the end of 1941, over 150 Stirlings had been manufactured, and three RAF squadrons were equipped with the bomber. The Stirling was used in both day and night bombing operations and was part of “Circus” operations, which involved a mix of fighters and bombers.
Read More: Japan’s Innovative WWII Fighter – Kyushu J7W Shinden
From late 1941, Stirlings began to play a crucial role in the newly formed RAF Pathfinder squadrons, which specialized in navigation and target-marking to assist main bomber forces. By spring 1942, their numbers in service had grown significantly.
In May 1943, Stirling bombers frequently participated in large-scale raids over Germany, sometimes involving over a hundred aircraft. Notably, Stirlings were part of the RAF’s first 1,000 bomber raid against Cologne. Norris noted the Stirling’s resilience, highlighting incidents where damaged Stirlings, including one that collided with a Messerschmitt Bf 109 over Hamburg, managed to return to base.
Outmaneuver Nightfighters
Despite its subpar performance at high altitudes, Stirling pilots found that its thick wing allowed it to outmaneuver nightfighters like the Junkers Ju 88 and Messerschmitt Bf 110. Many pilots preferred its handling over the Halifax, and some even favored it over the Lancaster.
Flight Lieutenant Murray Peden of No. 214 Squadron RAF praised the Stirling as “one of the finest aircraft ever built.” However, its thick wing also meant a lower ceiling, often forcing missions to be flown as low as 12,000 feet.
This was particularly problematic when flying over the Alps to Italy, making Stirlings an easier target for Luftwaffe when flying with higher-altitude RAF bombers. Within five months of its introduction, 67 out of 84 Stirlings had been lost to enemy action or accidents.
Short Stirling Had a 3,500-Pound Payload
The Stirling’s maximum bomb load was limited to short-range missions of about 590 miles. On longer missions to Germany or Italy, it typically carried a 3,500-pound payload, comparable to the RAF’s medium bombers like the Vickers Wellington and, by 1944, the de Havilland Mosquito.
The Stirling’s large bomb bay, while spacious, was limited to carrying bombs no larger than 2,000 pounds due to structural dividers. As the RAF began using larger bombs, the Stirling’s utility diminished. With the introduction of the Halifax and especially the Lancaster, which offered better performance, the Stirling was reassigned to secondary tasks from 1943.
Read More: Fiat 7002: The Flying Drinks Cabinet
During its tenure with Bomber Command, Stirlings completed 14,500 sorties, dropping 27,000 tons of bombs but losing 582 aircraft in action and writing off another 119.
By December 1943, Stirlings were being withdrawn from frontline bombing but continued in roles like mine-laying, electronic countermeasures, covert operations, and glider towing.
Battle of Normandy and Operation Market Garden
In 1943, recognizing the need for aircraft to tow heavy gliders like the General Aircraft Hamilcar and Airspeed Horsa, the Stirling was found to be well-suited for this role.
Late in the year, 143 Mk.III bombers were converted to the Mk.IV configuration for towing gliders and paratroop deployment, in addition to 461 newly manufactured Mk.IVs. These aircraft were instrumental in the Battle of Normandy and Operation Market Garden, and some were used in Operation Glimmer on June 6, 1944, for deploying radar decoys.
No. 138 (Special Duties) Squadron acquired 22 Stirlings in May 1944 to support European resistance groups organized by the Special Operations Executive. The Stirling could carry 18 standard “C” Type containers in its bomb bay and additional smaller packages in its spacious fuselage.
Read More: Fiat 7002: The Flying Drinks Cabinet
Experiments to expedite package deployment were delayed until post-war due to concerns about shifting the aircraft’s center of gravity. From late 1944, 160 Stirling Mk V variants, modified for special transport with a new nose and no tail turret, were built, with most completed after the war.
Modified to S.37 Standards
By 1946, Stirlings in Transport Command were being phased out, replaced by the Avro York, a transport derivative of the Lancaster. While many Stirlings were scrapped, 12 were modified to S.37 standards and sold to Belgian charter operator Trans-Air in May 1947.
The operational history of the Short Stirling, therefore, is a narrative of adaptation and resilience. From its early days as a trailblazer in the RAF’s heavy bomber force to its later use in support and special operations roles, the Stirling demonstrated a versatility that was crucial to the Allied war effort.
Read More: The Caproni Ca.60 was a Nine Wing Cruise Liner
While it may not have achieved the lasting fame of some of its contemporaries, its contributions, particularly in the less glamorous but equally vital support roles, were indispensable to the success of many critical wartime operations.
Development of Several Variants of the Short Stirling
The Short Stirling’s journey throughout World War II was marked not only by its initial role as a heavy bomber but also by the development of several variants and its adaptation to a range of other crucial roles.
As the war progressed and the limitations of the Stirling became apparent in its primary role, the aircraft was reconfigured and repurposed, showcasing its versatility and the ingenuity of its designers. One of the key variants of the Stirling was the Mk III, which was equipped with more powerful engines. This variant represented an effort to enhance the performance of the aircraft, particularly its operational ceiling and speed.
While this improvement did address some of the aircraft’s initial shortcomings, it was not enough to keep it competitive with newer bombers entering service. Nevertheless, the Mk III variant demonstrated the potential for the Stirling to adapt to evolving wartime needs.
Read More: N1 Rocket – The Most Powerful Space Rocket Ever Built
Another significant adaptation was the Mk IV version, which was modified for use in transport and glider-towing roles. This variant played a pivotal role in airborne operations, notably in the delivery of troops and equipment.
The Stirling’s large payload capacity and robust design made it particularly suitable for towing heavy gliders, a task that was essential in several key operations, including the D-Day landings and Operation Market Garden. The ability of the Stirling to adapt to these roles was a testament to its robust and flexible design.
Specialized Equipment
The Stirling also saw service in other specialized roles, such as electronic countermeasures and maritime reconnaissance. These roles often leveraged the aircraft’s range and payload capacity, allowing it to carry specialized equipment necessary for these missions.
In the electronic countermeasures role, Stirlings were equipped with devices to jam German radar, playing a crucial part in the RAF’s efforts to deceive and disrupt enemy defenses.
The various roles that the Stirling undertook highlight the aircraft’s adaptability and the ingenuity of its operators. Although it was phased out of the heavy bombing role, the Stirling found a new lease of life in these varied duties.
Read More: Tupolev Tu-104 – the First Soviet Jet Liner
Its contribution to airborne operations, in particular, was significant, as it played a critical role in delivering troops and equipment behind enemy lines. This versatility ensured that the Stirling remained a valuable asset to the RAF throughout the war, despite the challenges it faced in its initial role as a bomber.
Short Stirling Shelf Life
The end of service and the legacy of the Short Stirling paint a picture of an aircraft that, while overshadowed by more advanced bombers as World War II progressed, left a lasting impact on military aviation through its pioneering design and versatile roles.
As the war entered its later stages, the Stirling was increasingly relegated from its primary role as a frontline bomber. This transition was primarily due to its limitations in altitude and bomb load compared to newer bombers like the Avro Lancaster and the Handley Page Halifax.
These newer aircraft could fly higher and carry more bombs, making them more effective and less vulnerable in the intense bombing campaigns over Europe. By 1944, the Stirling had been largely phased out of active bombing missions.
Read More: Myasishchev VM-T – The Soviet Space Rocket Transporter
Despite being overshadowed in the bombing role, the Stirling carved out a niche in other vital capacities. Its large frame and robust design made it well-suited for transport and glider-towing duties, roles it performed with distinction until the end of the war.
Success of Allied Operations
As we know, the Stirling was instrumental in several critical airborne operations, including the D-Day landings and Operation Market Garden, where its ability to tow heavy gliders and transport large numbers of paratroopers proved invaluable. These contributions, though less celebrated, were crucial to the success of Allied operations.
The legacy of the Short Stirling is multifaceted. Technologically, it represented a significant step forward in the development of heavy bombers. As the RAF’s first four-engine heavy bomber, it set the stage for subsequent designs, showcasing the potential of multi-engine aircraft in long-range and high-capacity bombing roles.
The design challenges and operational experiences with the Stirling provided valuable lessons that influenced the development of later bombers.
Read More The Convair XB-46 is a Forgotten Jet-Age Bomber
In a broader historical context, the Stirling’s legacy is also found in its role in shaping air warfare tactics during WWII. Its deployment in various roles demonstrated the increasing versatility required of military aircraft and the importance of adaptability in rapidly changing combat scenarios.
After the war, the Stirling faded from active service, and few examples survived, with none preserved in complete form. This scarcity has somewhat diminished its profile in the annals of aviation history.
However, among military historians and aviation enthusiasts, the Stirling holds a place of respect for its contributions and as a symbol of the technological and strategic shifts in aerial warfare during one of the most tumultuous periods of the 20th century.
